think positive wrote:Wokko wrote:Everyone thinks restricting protest is a good idea when they're ideologically opposed to the protest.
If they assault people then arrest them, otherwise they should be free to express their view and protest something they find to be fundamentally wrong. If you cheer on restricting pro lifers then don't sook once union or pro-refugee protests or whoever is winning the privilege olympics at the moment get shut down.
Great post
An exclusion area is a good idea, but the. It would be for all protests
As I said earlier, protesting is one thing, harassment is another.
Everyone has the right to protest but if the form of that protest includes harassing innocent people then they need to be moved back.
People have the right to protest, people also have the right to go about undertaking legal activities without being harassed and bullied by people who don't agree with that activity.
Same reason an exclusion zone exists for protesters against duck hunting, a legal but unpopular activity.
Wokko is right in that it's can't only be one way.
That's also why I disagree as I've said before with allowing counter protests to happen at the same time. There needs to be separation.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.