Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
White Witts and Grundy doesn't go

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2014 7:59 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

swoop42 wrote:
Time to unleash the peoples beard.


Bertha? Shocked

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
AN_Inkling 



Joined: 06 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2014 8:27 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

jackcass wrote:
Until we have Reid or Karnezis to help out Cloke up forward when White goes into the ruck, I don't think we have any alternative. Yes, Witts and Grundy get exposed a bit but I don't think it's more so than the alternatives would.

Maybe Oxley could play forward in the interim but he is not a KPP and he needs to find some fitness first.


Marsh? Could be the new Rusling with lightning speed on the lead.

_________________
Well done boys!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Beast 



Joined: 26 Oct 2011


PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2014 8:36 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Whats to discuss?
We've all seen that White produces the goods and is more involved when he is the second ruck. Pity that our coach has other ideas...
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Warnings : 1 
Harvey 



Joined: 15 Oct 2003


PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:31 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Beast wrote:
Whats to discuss?
We've all seen that White produces the goods and is more involved when he is the second ruck. Pity that our coach has other ideas...


It's more Reid's calf/quad and Karnezis's hammies having their own ideas rather than bucks. Once we have a genuine KPP forward available in reserve, guaranteed Bucks would bring them in and make White the second ruck.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
jackcass Cancer



Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo

PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:47 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

AN_Inkling wrote:
jackcass wrote:
Until we have Reid or Karnezis to help out Cloke up forward when White goes into the ruck, I don't think we have any alternative. Yes, Witts and Grundy get exposed a bit but I don't think it's more so than the alternatives would.

Maybe Oxley could play forward in the interim but he is not a KPP and he needs to find some fitness first.


Marsh? Could be the new Rusling with lightning speed on the lead.


Still got a bit to learn I'd imagine. You'd probably get better output than his NAB cup games but would still get exposed. Maybe 2015 he becomes an option.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
SuperStar Beams Gemini



Joined: 25 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:29 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Beast wrote:
Whats to discuss?
We've all seen that White produces the goods and is more involved when he is the second ruck. Pity that our coach has other ideas...


Yes White produces more when 2nd ruck but whats the point of having Grundy and Witts in if one of them isnt going to ruck.
We cant have Grundy and Witts in the same team anymore even though they held their own in the hit outs
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
RudeBoy 



Joined: 28 Nov 2005


PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:34 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

SuperStar Beams wrote:
Beast wrote:
Whats to discuss?
We've all seen that White produces the goods and is more involved when he is the second ruck. Pity that our coach has other ideas...


Yes White produces more when 2nd ruck but whats the point of having Grundy and Witts in if one of them isnt going to ruck.
We cant have Grundy and Witts in the same team anymore even though they held their own in the hit outs


Agreed.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 10 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group