View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Piesnchess
piesnchess
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
|
Post subject: Is a forward line of McStay, Kroooge, great prospect ? | |
|
OK, just a suggestion, you know how Caaaarlton has twin towers up forward, Curnow, and McKay, big buggers, could a forward line of McStay, Krueger, be equal along lines of that, maybe with Checkers too, say, next season ? Is it feasible, and could it work ? Just asking. _________________ Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb. |
|
|
|
|
Said by Zed
Joined: 21 Mar 2021
|
Post subject: | |
|
I for one can’t wait to see that. Thought Kroogs was okay today, was honest and fought hard both forward and when relieving in the ruck, although did have a couple of opportunities to ice the game but missed.
McStay, Mihocek and Kroogs would definitely put the skerrits up a few defences. _________________ The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men... |
|
|
|
|
Haff
Joined: 25 Apr 2016
|
Post subject: | |
|
Krooga probably gets forced out for team balance but he does bring an exuberance that few do. _________________ The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after. |
|
|
|
|
lazzadesilva
Joined: 04 Feb 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
He brings much needed size and height to the forward line and frees up Frampton to play back. I don’t know if we can play both Cox and Kruger in the same team but at this point, I’d prefer Kruger. _________________ I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️ |
|
|
|
|
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
With Kroog,s and McStay put Bobby and Shultzie at their feet
That could be delicious _________________ I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
lazzadesilva
Joined: 04 Feb 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
So you wouldn’t play Cox? _________________ I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️ |
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname
Joined: 29 May 2010 Location: Living rent free
|
Post subject: | |
|
Lol..DREAMIN'
McStay and Kruegs aren't Curnow and McKay. Stop dreaming.
Curnow and McKay are Coleman medallists. McStay and Kruegs aint no Coleman medallists. _________________ Fighting against the objectification of woman. |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
lazzadesilva wrote: | So you wouldn’t play Cox? |
Cox has been 2nd-rate all season and was getting games by default.
If Kruger stays fit and firing in ruck relief to DC, Cox can pull up a chair in the stands until he pulls his finger out. _________________ M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
Said by Zed
Joined: 21 Mar 2021
|
Post subject: | |
|
Great conundrum for us to have as opposed to where we were several weeks ago….heard next in line for a debut was the boot studder at FF! _________________ The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men... |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Cox has always been great on his day....but those days are few and far between these days. On his off days, he is a real liability.
Krueger, is not as tall, nor as good a ruckman as Cox, but he offers far more aggression and forward positioning. Given that we really only need a 2nd ruck in brief spells, to relieve Cameron, the greater mobility and competitiveness of Krueger makes him my firm preference.
A forward line with McStay, Krueger and Checkers, supported by Hill, (hopefully) Elliott and Schultz would be my preferred lineup in September.
Last edited by RudeBoy on Sun Jun 16, 2024 9:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
Johnno75
Joined: 07 Oct 2010 Location: Wantirna
|
Post subject: | |
|
piedys wrote: | lazzadesilva wrote: | So you wouldn’t play Cox? |
Cox has been 2nd-rate all season and was getting games by default.
If Kruger stays fit and firing in ruck relief to DC, Cox can pull up a chair in the stands until he pulls his finger out. |
This….clearly DC can play the sole ruck with a chop out from Krueger or McStay then with Checkers Cox will struggle to get back in.
Let’s just hope Krugs stays injury free. _________________ Human behavioural studies suggest people who use a lot of swear words tend to be more honest & trustworthy. |
|
|
|
|
Piesnchess
piesnchess
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
|
Post subject: | |
|
BazBoy wrote: | With Kroog,s and McStay put Bobby and Shultzie at their feet
That could be delicious |
Bruce Mcaveney and Cyril say hello. _________________ Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb. |
|
|
|
|
Piesnchess
piesnchess
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
|
Post subject: | |
|
What'sinaname wrote: | Lol..DREAMIN'
McStay and Kruegs aren't Curnow and McKay. Stop dreaming.
Curnow and McKay are Coleman medallists. McStay and Kruegs aint no Coleman medallists. |
Curnow is a star, granted, but McKay is not, misses far too many goals. Do you forget McStay got us into the GF, off his own boot. _________________ Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb. |
|
|
|
|
Newelly
newelly
Joined: 21 Apr 1999 Location: Perth again.
|
Post subject: | |
|
We need to find talls in the 2024 trade period. Kreuger should be solid but unlikely to exceed that level. Cox looking past it. McStay was number 3 at the Lions. _________________ Chuffed to have seen 3 flag wins in my lifetime but still greedy for more. |
|
|
|
|
WhyPhilWhy?
WhyPhilWhy?
Joined: 09 Oct 2001 Location: Location: Location:
|
Post subject: | |
|
whatever leaves Reef as the third tall works for me. |
|
|
|
|
|