| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
^^I'm not so sure. If Aish is seen as a better player than Scharenberg, there's nothing wrong with picking Aish and Salem as they are very different players despite both being mids. I'd not be passing on a better player just for balance. Not saying Aish is better, just that if he is, we should take him.
_________________
Well done boys! |
|
|
|
 |
Captain_MyCaptain 
Joined: 25 May 2006
Location: home
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Captain_MyCaptain wrote: | The most interesting intriguing draft for us in years.
Pick 6; Scharenberg or Bontempelli. Preference, Scharenberg.
Pick 10; Freeman or Aish. Preference, Freeman.
Pick 67; Willsmore. preference, none.
cheers. |
Cheers. 
_________________
The window is open my friend! |
|
|
|
|
Breadcrawl
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Breadcrawl wrote: |
I'll settle for two of Scharenburg, Freeman, Aish, Salem |
I'm claiming it too CMC
_________________
they can smell what we're cookin' |
|
|
|
|
Captain_MyCaptain
Joined: 25 May 2006
Location: home
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Breadcrawl wrote: | | Breadcrawl wrote: |
I'll settle for two of Scharenburg, Freeman, Aish, Salem |
I'm claiming it too CMC |
edit.
_________________
The window is open my friend!
Last edited by Captain_MyCaptain on Fri Nov 22, 2013 1:29 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
Breadcrawl
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
u2 
_________________
they can smell what we're cookin' |
|
|
|
|
E
Joined: 05 May 2010
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Pochemuchka wrote: | | Breadcrawl wrote: | | Pochemuchka wrote: | | swoop42 wrote: | | ^Two top 10 picks will do that. |
i guess. i still can't really get over what appears to be daylight robbery going on. no team in the top 8 should be afforded this luxury.
|
Sounds like you feel guilty mate
The system has been contrived and it is what it is. Our staff is making the system work for them and doing it really, really well.
The playing field isn't level and we are running up hill. Exploiting the "vagaries" of the system is the only way we are going to be able to compete against our dark overlords.
A core group of players including these two guys, Grundy, JT, Broomhead, Adams, Kennedy, Williams, Seedsman and Witts are going to wreak a decade's worth of destruction on opposition teams and it was assembled while we played finals every year.
Can you imagine what type of supporter you'd have to be to think Bucks wasn't on the right track? |
no conscience on this one. i just find it laughable that we have done so well. |
dont forget that we lost two players, who when fit are easily in the best 50 ploayers in the league and daisy was at one time a top 10 player.
Part of the reason we finished 8th and not 4th is because they werent prodicing at that level in 2013.
So i would say our team has made tremendous improvement from our 2013 team as it was, but has lost some real guns.
_________________
Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk ....... |
|
|
|
|
Breadcrawl
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Nah the reason we finished 8th not 4th is we tanked a final in order to earn last night's spoils.
But yes we had to replace Dale. But he may or may not have worked his way back into the 22 anyway
_________________
they can smell what we're cookin' |
|
|
|
|
Albert Parker
Joined: 13 Dec 2012
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Daisy definitely best 22 but only once in our top 5 in the B&F. Says something over so many seasons to me. Think we'll do all right out of his departure given the draft pick we got, what we turned it into (6) and the salary cap room it creates.
_________________
One team, one dream - the Pies and this year's premiership |
|
|
|
|
John Wren 
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Breadcrawl wrote: | | Breadcrawl wrote: |
I'll settle for two of Scharenburg, Freeman, Aish, Salem |
I'm claiming it too CMC |
a boxed quinella.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Pochemuchka wrote: | | aish and sharenberg. (salem) |
breadcrawler, freeman was the substitute runner for salem so technically i will claim this one.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
Breadcrawl
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Pochemuchka wrote: | | Pochemuchka wrote: | | aish and sharenberg. (salem) |
breadcrawler, freeman was the substitute runner for salem so technically i will claim this one. |
You are clutching son. We got the first two I named in order so it was an exacta not a quinella
You didn't name freeman at all
Who you trying to pull one on Pochahontas?!
_________________
they can smell what we're cookin' |
|
|
|
|
Breadcrawl
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Albert Parker wrote: | | Daisy definitely best 22 but only once in our top 5 in the B&F. Says something over so many seasons to me. Think we'll do all right out of his departure given the draft pick we got, what we turned it into (6) and the salary cap room it creates. |
Meh. I replaced Dale with a baby wearing a slice of bread.
It wasn't so hard
Freeman and Scharenberg both have faces that say football star to me - as Dale did/does admittedly.
We are well in front I reckon
_________________
they can smell what we're cookin' |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Breadcrawl wrote: | | Pochemuchka wrote: | | Pochemuchka wrote: | | aish and sharenberg. (salem) |
breadcrawler, freeman was the substitute runner for salem so technically i will claim this one. |
You are clutching son. We got the first two I named in order so it was an exacta not a quinella
You didn't name freeman at all
Who you trying to pull one on Pochahontas?! |
this looks like a boxed quinella to me fella. 
| Quote: | | I'll settle for two of Scharenburg, Freeman, Aish, Salem |
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
Breadcrawl
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Fine have it your way you tight-ass :p
Tom Waterhouse would prolly give you your money back Pochie...
_________________
they can smell what we're cookin' |
|
|
|
|
E
Joined: 05 May 2010
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Breadcrawl wrote: | Nah the reason we finished 8th not 4th is we tanked a final in order to earn last night's spoils.
But yes we had to replace Dale. But he may or may not have worked his way back into the 22 anyway |
do you thinkk Hine told Bucks "look there are only 11 good players in this years draft, so we have to lose to Port to ensure we get pick 10 so that when Daisy leaves, we'll get pick 11 and be assured at least 2 of them?
_________________
Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk ....... |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
