View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Di Di Didak
Joined: 31 Mar 2003 Location: Melbourne
|
Post subject: Collingwoods 19yo... | |
|
Who do u think...
Here are the 19 yo listings at collingwood who possibly got their marching orders...
David King
Luke Mullins
Shack
IMO... Mullins gone, closely to be followed by Shack. |
|
|
|
|
d9 tank
Joined: 04 Oct 2002 Location: Victoria
|
Post subject: | |
|
If it's true I think it would have been Mullins.
I don't think Nixon and Shacks will be too far behind either. |
|
|
|
|
Joel
Joined: 23 Mar 1999 Location: Mornington Peninsula
|
Post subject: | |
|
Interesting. I guess we will have to wait and see who it/they are. |
|
|
|
|
Macgyver
Joined: 22 Jul 2003 Location: Wangaratta, Vic
|
Post subject: | |
|
I can tell you it was not mullins because i saw him in Wangaratta and he hasn't had his meeting with MM yet. |
|
|
|
|
Johnson#26
Joined: 18 Dec 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Mullins, Nixon...isn't McGough 19? |
|
|
|
|
Big T
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Location: Torino, Italy
|
Post subject: | |
|
Nixon must go. _________________ Buon Giorno |
|
|
|
|
Cam
Nick's BB Member #166
Joined: 10 May 2002 Location: Springvale
|
Post subject: | |
|
Snackleton _________________ Get back on top. |
|
|
|
|
magpie meg
Joined: 12 Oct 2003 Location: Croydon - Victoria
|
Post subject: | |
|
goughy is 20 _________________ Partyn & the pies is there nemore to life??? |
|
|
|
|
Sultan of spin
Joined: 31 Aug 2003 Location: Burnley
|
Post subject: | |
|
From the 3 listed above it is most likely to be Shack, that is of course persuming the info is reliable |
|
|
|
|
Pants & Rowdy
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
|
Post subject: | |
|
It will not be Shackleton. Shacks was consistently very good down at Willy this year and based purely on the performances at Willy they will continue to develop him next year in his third year of footy.
My tip is Mullins, McGough will seek to be traded so his situation requires no guess work but nixon could be a smokey but he is also 20 going on 21 _________________ Never Forget the #42 |
|
|
|
|
Morrigu
Joined: 11 Aug 2001
|
Post subject: | |
|
McGough asked to be traded at his meeting with MM - and earnt a fair mouthful for asking!!
Eade showing interest in him - don't know how far this has progressed as Goughy still in Bali |
|
|
|
|
vinnie_vegas69
Joined: 18 Sep 2004
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pants & Rowdy wrote: | It will not be Shackleton. Shacks was consistently very good down at Willy this year and based purely on the performances at Willy they will continue to develop him next year in his third year of footy.
My tip is Mullins, McGough will seek to be traded so his situation requires no guess work but nixon could be a smokey but he is also 20 going on 21 |
Let's not forget that Malthouse said last year "I love Luke Shackleton".
That's a good sign for Shacks. |
|
|
|
|
Doc63
Joined: 06 May 2004 Location: Newport
|
Post subject: | |
|
vinnie_vegas69 wrote: | Let's not forget that Malthouse said last year "I love Luke Shackleton".
That's a good sign for Shacks. |
Thats like the President saying the Coach has the full support of the Board!! |
|
|
|
|
vinnie_vegas69
Joined: 18 Sep 2004
|
Post subject: | |
|
Doc63 wrote: | vinnie_vegas69 wrote: | Let's not forget that Malthouse said last year "I love Luke Shackleton".
That's a good sign for Shacks. |
Thats like the President saying the Coach has the full support of the Board!! |
Well, not really, because a year has passed since then and he hasn't been sacked, which probably means that Malthouse really did mean it.
Besides, there's no good reason to drop Shackleton, I don't know why so many people here are keen to drop both him and Bo Nixon... |
|
|
|
|
Cam
Nick's BB Member #166
Joined: 10 May 2002 Location: Springvale
|
Post subject: | |
|
"you don't love me any-morrrreee" sang Luke Cocker. _________________ Get back on top. |
|
|
|
|
|