This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Pies4shaw wrote:I only saw him play in the finals (why would anyone watch North if there was a proper game of football on at the same time?) but I thought he lacked class and was on the slow side. What do others think? I'm not interested in his stats, I'm interested in whether people think he could be a solid, contributing part of the next Collingwood premiership team.
I watched a few North games this year and all the finals. I thought he was exceptional. Tough and hard at the footy, big bodied and great decision making. That said his worst game was the syd game.
He is genuinely touted as a possible B&F winner this year so for mine given the loss of Beams he would be a great addition along with the beams compo.
Thanks for that response, MJ23. Sorry I didn't respond sooner - I missed yours in the flurry. I'm interested in your comment about the Swans game. I may just be marking him down unfairly on that one performance.
He wasn't one of the worst against swans. Had 21 and kicked a goal however the whole team was smashed so we wasn't able to play much if a run and carry game - spent a lot if time defending.
Against essendon though especially when bombers were up and about he was sensational.
"Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan
Brisbane gives up 5 and 25 for Beams (in my opinion, this is a huge win for Brisbane). We give up 25 for Greenwood (maybe we keep that and give our number 30).
E wrote:i think that the following deal will get done:
Brisbane gives up 5 and 25 for Beams (in my opinion, this is a huge win for Brisbane). We give up 25 for Greenwood (maybe we keep that and give our number 30).
Be nice if we could orchestrate pick 30 for Greenwood, would mean we at least upgrade our 2nd round pick, just think North will want more.
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, I think sometimes we try too hard to get the utopian deal and meantime the players get sick of the haggling and get better offers. This seems like it might be the case with Greenwood and was probably why Clark chose the cats
Little Wonder wrote:A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, I think sometimes we try too hard to get the utopian deal and meantime the players get sick of the haggling and get better offers. This seems like it might be the case with Greenwood and was probably why Clark chose the cats
Not too sure as yet about Levi Greenwood but I share your views about the reason we lost Clark from choosing us. We piss farted around too much.
Little Wonder wrote:A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, I think sometimes we try too hard to get the utopian deal and meantime the players get sick of the haggling and get better offers. This seems like it might be the case with Greenwood and was probably why Clark chose the cats
Not too sure as yet about Levi Greenwood but I share your views about the reason we lost Clark from choosing us. We piss farted around too much.
Little Wonder wrote:A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, I think sometimes we try too hard to get the utopian deal and meantime the players get sick of the haggling and get better offers. This seems like it might be the case with Greenwood and was probably why Clark chose the cats
it was reported in one of the dailies that we took a long time to complete the due dilligence and get back to clark. in that time, he wandered over to geelong.